Bridging Capitalisms
The Transatlantic Hybridization between Italian Liberal Socialism and U.S. Public Choice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60923/issn.2611-2752/22551Keywords:
James Buchanan, Francesco Forte, Socialism, Capitalism, Transatlantic Relationship, Reagan, CraxiAbstract
This article investigates the intellectual dialogue between James M. Buchanan and Francesco Forte, two key figures who shaped the economic thinking of Ronald Reagan and Bettino Craxi. Drawing on archival materials from the U.S. and Italy, it traces how constitutional economics and the Italian tradition of Scienza delle finanze converged to produce a case of ideological hybridization. Their transatlantic exchange—embedded in institutional reform projects—offers new insights into Cold War capitalism and a novel contribution to the New History of Capitalism by highlighting the role of transnational intellectual exchanges in reshaping economic governance.
References
Bruno Amable, The Diversity of modern capitalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).
Sven Beckert and Christine Desan, ed., American capitalism: new histories (New York: Columbia University Press, 2018).
Johanna Bockman, “Being there in neoliberalism”, Spectator 44, n. 2 (2024): 13-18.
Johanna Bockman, Markets in the name of socialism. The left-wing origins of neoliberalism (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2011).
Alessandro Brogi, Confronting America. The Cold War between the United States and the Communists in France and Italy (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2011).
Giacomo Brioni, “Bruno Leoni, James M. Buchanan and the quest for a theory of collective action”, Il Politico 1 (2025): 147-172.
Luigi Bruti Liberati, Words, Words, Words. La guerra fredda dell’USIS in Italia (Milan: CUEM, 2004).
James M. Buchanan, “An Economic theory of clubs”, Economica 32, no. 125 (1965): 1-14.
James M. Buchanan, The demand and supply of public goods (Chicago: Rand McNally, 1968), 166-168.
James M. Buchanan, “‘La scienza delle finanze’: the Italian tradition in fiscal theory”, in Fiscal theory and political economy (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1960): 24-74.
James M. Buchanan, The limits of liberty: between anarchy and leviathan (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1975).
James M. Buchanan and Gordon Tullock, The Calculus of consent: logical foundations of constitutional democracy (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1962).
James M. Buchanan and William Craig Stubblebine, “Externality”, Economica 29, no. 116 (1962): 371-384.
James M. Buchanan, Robert D. Tollison, and Gordon Tullock, ed., Towards a theory of the rent seeking society (College Station: Texas A&M University Press, 1980).
Bruce Caldwell, “Hayek and Socialism”, Journal of Economic Literature 35, no. 4 (1997): 1856-1890, 1869.
Ha-Joon Chang, Bad Samaritans: The Myth of Free Trade and the Secret History of Capitalism (London: Bloomsberry Press, 2007).
Ronald Coase, “The Problem of Social Cost,” The Journal of Law and Economics 3, no. 1 (1960): 35.
James Crotty, Keynes Against Capitalism: His Economic Case for Liberal Socialism (London: Routledge, 2009).
Raimondo Cubeddu, “I liberisti nella cultura politica italiana”, Philosphy kitchen 8, no. 5 (2018): 61-94, 67.
Raimondo Cubeddu, Margini del liberalismo (Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino, 2003).
Antonio Di Majo and Antonio Pedone, ed., Elementi di scienza delle finanze (Firenze: La Nuova Italia, 1985).
Daniela Donnini Macciò, “La riflessione sul metodo della scienza delle finanze in Benvenuto Griziotti (1909-1940)”, Quaderni di storia dell’economia politica 8, no. 2-3 (1990): 261-276.
Lee Edwards, “Barry M. Goldwater: the most consequential loser in American politics”, The Heritage foundation: First principles 11 (2014).
Giuseppe Eusepi, “From subjectivism to constitutionalism: The intellectual journey of James M. Buchanan through his Italian heroes”, Public choice 183, no. 6 (2020): 273-285.
Flavio Felice and Markus Krienke, “Understanding social market economy, Francesco Forte and his interpretation”, International advances in economic research 23, no. 1 (2017): 21-37.
Michel Foucault, Naissance de La Biopolitique :Cours au College de France, 1978-1979 (Paris: Gallimard/Seuil, 2004).
Francesco Forte, “Indagini sulla natura e gli effetti economici delle imposte sul valore aggiunto”, Quaderni dell’istituto di scienze economiche dell’Università degli Studi di Milano (1955).
Francesco Forte, “Intervista sulla classe dirigente italiana: la teoria dello shock”, Ventunesimo Secolo 8, no. 19 (2009): 97-108.
Francesco Forte, Introduzione alla politica economica. Il mercato e i piani (Turin: Piccola Biblioteca Einaudi, 1964).
Francesco Forte, La congiuntura economica del 1961-65 (Turin: Einaudi, 1967).
Francesco Forte, La strategia delle riforme (Milan: ETAS kompass, 1971).
Francesco Forte, L’economia liberale di Luigi Einaudi. Saggi (Florence: Leo S. Olschki, 2009).
Francesco Forte, “Motor vehicle taxation as pricing of highways service. Some theoretical notes”, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review 34 (1955): 134-142.
Francesco Forte, “On James Buchanan’s public choice enterprise”, Journal of public finance and public choice 31 (2013): 61-75.
Francesco Forte and Alberto di Pierro, “A pure model of public bureaucracy”, Public finance 35, no. 1 (1980): 91-100.
Francesco Forte and Elena Granaglia, ed., La nuova economia politica americana (Milan: SugarCo Edizioni, 1980).
Francesco Forte and James M. Buchanan, “The evaluation of public services”, Journal of political economy 69, no. 2 (1961): 107-121.
Francis Fukuyama, The end of history and the last man (New York: Free Press, 1992).
John Kenneth Galbraith, American Capitalism: The Concept of Countervailing Power (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1952).
John Lewis Gaddis, We now know: rethinking Cold War history (Clarendon Press, 1997).
Gary Gerstle, The Rise and Fall of the Neoliberal Order. America and the World in the Free Market Era (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022).
Peter A. Hall, and David Soskice, ed., Varieties of capitalism: the institutional foundations of comparative advantage (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).
Friedrich August von Hayek, Collectivist economic planning (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1935).
Ola Innset, Reinventing Liberalism. The Politics, Philosophy and Economics of Early Neoliberalism (1920-1947) (Cham: Springer Nature, 2020).
Jürgen Kocka, Capitalism: a short history (Princeton-Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2016).
Anne O. Krueger, “The Political Economy of the Rent-Seeking Society”, American Economic Review 64, no. 3 (1974): 291-303.
Bruno Leoni, Freedom and the law (Princeton: Van Nostrand, 1961).
Kenneth Lipartito, “Reassembling the economic: new departures in historical materialism”, The American historical review 121, no. 1. (2016): 101-139.
Nancy MacLean, The deep history of the radical right’s stealth plan for America (New York: Viking Press, 2017).
Antonio Masala, Stato, società e libertà. Dal liberalismo al neoliberalismo (Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino, 2017).
Patrick McCarthy, The Crisis of the Italian State: From the Origins of the Cold War to the Fall of Berlusconi (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1995).
Philip Mirowski and Dieter Plehwe, ed., The road from Mont Pèlerin: The making of the neoliberal thought collective (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2009).
Ludwig von Mises, Economic calculation in the socialist commonwealth (Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute, 1990).
Ludwig von Mises, Liberalismo (Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino, 1997).
Dennis C. Mueller, Public choice III (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).
Gilbert Warren Nutter, Growth of Industrial Production in the Soviet Union (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1962).
Leonardo Paggi, “La nuova globalizzazione degli anni Ottanta e i mutamenti nelle tradizioni politiche europee”, in Revisionismo socialista e rinnovamento liberale, ed. Paolo Borioni (Rome: Carocci, 2001), 23-36.
Raghuram G. Rajan and Luigi Zingales, Saving Capitalism from the Capitalists: Unleashing the Power of Financial Markets to Create Wealth and Spread Opportunity (New York: Crown Publishing Group, 2003).
Philip Rathgeb, How the Radical Right Has Changed Capitalism and Welfare in Europe and the USA (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2023).
Tilman Reitz and Dirk Jörke, “The Reshaping of Political Representation in Postgrowth Capitalism: A Paradigmatic Analysis of Green and Right-Wing Populist Parties”, Anthropology Theory 21, no. 3 (2021): 287-314.
Seth Rockman, “What makes the history of capitalism newsworthy?”, Journal of the early republic 34, no. 3 (2014): 439-466.
Frances Stonor Saunders, Who paid the piper? The CIA and the cultural Cold War (London: Granta Books, 1999).
Harm Schepel, “Rules of Recognition: a Legal Constructivist approach to transnational private regulation”, in Regulatory Hybridization in the Transnational sphere, ed. Paulius Jurčys, Poul F. Kjaer and Ren Yatsunami (Leiden-Boston: Martnus Nijhoff Publishers): 189-202.
Simone Selva, Before the Neoliberal Turn. The Rise of Energy Finance and the Limits to US Foreign Economic Policy (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017).
Quinn Slobodian, Globalists: The End of Empire and the Birth of Neoliberalism (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2018).
Giorgio Sorgonà, La scoperta della destra. Il Movimento sociale italiano e gli Stati Uniti (Rome: Viella, 2019).
Peter Temin, “The Cambridge history of capitalism”, Journal of economic literature 53, no. 4 (2015): 996-1016.
Simona Tobia, Advertising America, The United States Information Service in Italy (1945-1956) (Milan: LED Edizioni Universitarie, 2009).
Adair Turner, “Capitalism and the end of history”, RSA Journal 149, no. 5500 (2002): 36-38.
Giuliano Urbani, “Come ricordo Bruno Leoni”, Il Politico 47, no. 1 (1982): 169-176.
Salvatore Veca, “Sul liberalismo politico e la giustizia come equità”, Philosphy kitchen 8, no. 5 (2018): 8-23.
Richard E. Wagner, James M. Buchanan and liberal political economy: a rational reconstruction (Lanham: Lexington Books, 2017).
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Giovanni Battista Bronzini
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
